Talk:Dokapon Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm pretty sure this game is at least a spiritual sequel, or at the very least in the same mythos as Dokapon. It has a similar art style and battle system. No idea how to create that information, as I haven't much else to go on. --Epynephrin (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

actually, the Dokapon you are referring to is a sequel to original the Super Famicom Dokapon Series, one of which Dokapon Kingdom is actually a port of. -NullPointer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.197.215 (talk) 05:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten classes?[edit]

I have the game, and I believe that there are 12 classes total, in male and female versions. In-game, you can view a list of the classes. each is separated by gender, so you see fighter (male), fighter (female), etc. the ones you don't have unlocked yet show up as question marks. It's a list of 24, which when you divide in half, leaves 12 classes. However, I haven't seen anything online to substantiate this, so it's all based on the assumption that that is a sound deduction. Make of it what you will.

--> In response to Ten Classes?

If listed out, there are the three starting ones (Warrior, Thief, Magician), the 2nd tier ones (Monk, Cleric, Spellsword, Alchemist, and Ninja), classes that require you bringing an item back to the King for (Acrobat, Robo-Knight, Hero), and lastly the Darkling class. That's 12, multiplied by 2 is 24. Anyway, someone should link to a comprehensive gallery, it would be nicer if it was a guide. P4wn4g3 (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited content[edit]

The verifiability policy requires that we remove that which we cannot verify in a reliable source. Please revert your edit. czar 07:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dokapon Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]