This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
The contents of the Dome lounge page were merged into Dome car on 19th November 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
Should this article be merged into Dome car? There's considerable overlap between the two and I don't know the dome lounges, as opposed to dome coaches, dome sleepers etc merits a stand-alone article. Mackensen(talk) 18:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see a difference between dome cars and lounges, so I support a merge. --Aaron-Tripel (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've done some thinking on this question since I was asked to participate in the discussion. I was one of the main contributors to the original dome car article and my main efforts on this article specifically were to add references and images so that the article could be used in the Portal:Trains/Did you know section earlier this month. It struck me that this article was very U.S.-centric even though dome lounge cars have been used in Europe (as the photo from Sweden shows).
A lounge car is not necessarily a dome car, and neither is a dome car necessarily a lounge car. There are dome lounge cars, dome diner cars, dome sleeper cars and dome observation cars, and some cars combine aspects of three or more types so there are dome diner lounge cars and dome sleeper lounge cars. However, it seems to me that the most logical representation here is to consolidate all of the dome car types into the dome car article with subsections for the specialized types. This makes sense to me because a dome lounge car is primarily a dome car first, especially when judged solely by exterior spotting details. So I would support a merge. I'm more surprised that this article was created in 2008 and this discussion didn't come up earlier. Slambo(Speak) 15:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I was even aware these were separate articles (though I'm certain I've edited both). Slambo's solution makes perfect sense to me. Mackensen(talk) 14:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Done[reply]
Done