Talk:Domus Sanctae Marthae

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European Microstates: Vatican City Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).

Fair use images[edit]

Please add fair use images to this article! --88.77.228.243 (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Catholic POV[edit]

Who is Profesor Mary Ann Glendon? There is no reference for the quote attributed to her. When was she there? The hotel was built for $20 million dollars. It seems they would get more than "monastic simplicity" in exchange for that. If monastic simplicity was what they wanted, they already had what they had. This article is written to defend the Catholic point of view, and it needs more neutrality.John Paul Parks (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've identified her. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Former building[edit]

I found a citation for the idea that the former building was erected in 1891 to house the sick. But older sources that I can't quite get to say something different. For example this snippet:

Great and enthusiastic crowds came to Rome and, to help accommodate them, Saint Martha's Hospice was built in the Vatican and took care of forty thousand pilgrims that year. The jubilee was marked by the canonizations of John Baptiste de ...

That's an extract from Saint Peter and the Vatican: the legacy of the popes, page 163, by Allen Duston, Roberto Zagnoli, published by Art Services International in 2003. I see that John Baptiste de la Salle was canonized in 1900 and that would have been a big jubilee year. I just wonder. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 22:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thorough fact checking. The sentence structure is a little ambiguous. While it might imply that it was built in 1900 it could also merely mean that the building was repurposed at that time for the pilgrims since the cholera epidemic by that time was probably over. Again, many thanks for the nifty tidbit.Americasroof (talk) 23:01, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I note as well that the WP entry on the pandemic in question says the only major outbreak in Europe was in Hamburg in 1892. I'm getting more suspicious of the pandemic/1891 info. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found a superior Vatican source. Was built in anticipation of the cholera that never reached Rome. More details. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 02:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again many thanks for going the extra mile on research. Americasroof (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domus Sanctae Marthae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102224009/http://www.astorino.com/portfolio/chapel-of-the-holy-spirit to http://www.astorino.com/portfolio/chapel-of-the-holy-spirit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

72954

—146.168.173.19 (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't said (at least in any clear way) what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]