Talk:Don't You Wanna Stay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Don't You Wanna Stay has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Country Music (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Kelly Clarkson (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kelly Clarkson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kelly Clarkson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Songs (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Don't You Wanna Stay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{subst:#if:Okay, let's get this over with.|


Okay, let's get this over with.|}}

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{1acom}}}|}}
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{1bcom}}}|}}
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}
    C. No original research:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2ccom}}}|}}
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    {{subst:#if:No problems here.|No problems here.|}}
    B. Focused:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    {{subst:#if:Looks fine.|Looks fine.|}}
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    {{subst:#if:No edit wars whatsoever.|No edit wars whatsoever.|}}
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    {{subst:#if:Perhaps a screenshot of the live footage?|Perhaps a screenshot of the live footage?|}}
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    {{subst:#if:I guess there's no problem of preventing this from being a good article. So I'm passing this article. Well done!|I guess there's no problem of preventing this from being a good article. So I'm passing this article. Well done!|}}