|WikiProject Business||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
Value at Risk section
I removed this section from article:
López de Prado and Peijan (2008) have shown that Value at Risk substantially underestimates an investment's loss potential when its returns are incorrectly assumed to iid follow a Normal Distribution.
Is this at all relevant?
Please define variables
Please define variables: X(t), D(T), X(tau) just to make it as clear as possible...
- López de Prado and Peijan (2008): "Measuring the Loss Potential of Hedge Fund Strategies", Journal of Alternative Investments (7)1, 7-31. http://ssrn.com/abstract=641702