Talk:Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century
|WikiProject Film||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Animation / American / Looney Tunes||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
Proposed merge 
This article needs to be merged with the general Duck Dodgers article as the entirety of it is duplicated.
- Please sign your posts on talk pages, user 18.104.22.168. Yes, something should be done, and a merge is one possibility. Andrewa 19:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose the merge proposal. As a Hugo award winner and a frequent mention in lists of the funniest cartoons of all time, this particular cartoon should have its own article. Andrewa 03:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support the merge proposal. The information is redundant and there is not enough unique material to justify a seperate page. This viewpoint is supported by the fact that said material is not there and the article is mostly just a duplicate. 22.214.171.124 17:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The article is growing. That's what stubs are for. Andrewa 20:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Harry Love 
Plot copied from 
The plot section also needs a refactor IMO, which I'll do as I find time. Andrewa 06:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:DuckDodgersTitleCard.jpg 
Image:DuckDodgersTitleCard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hugo award winner? 
I'm lost. I can't find internal supporting evidence that the cartoon won a Hugo. The article to which both this article and the category in the footer point back to states it was a nominee not a winner. Specifically, I'm looking at the intro to the document which states, "Winning titles are listed first, with other nominees listed below," and the section which shows "DDit24.5C" below the winner for 2004. Could someone please point out what I'm missing? (If I'm correct than also the category for Hugo Award Winners needs fixing). --Aladdin Sane (talk) 02:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'll go you one better: From their official site]. It leaves this short as nominated but losing to George Pal's War of the Worlds. So I'd say that statement is in error. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)