Talk:Duke of Lennox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remarkable[edit]

How is this person one of the most remarkable men of the 18th Century? He seems to be a moderately accomplished politician who left a very short legacy. He certainly forgot one his primary duties as a peer; to leave an extensive family after himself.Cillmore (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His military career appears negligible as well; his brother seems to have been more "remarkable."Cillmore (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

The table has made the article unnecessary long, has removed the full names of the dukes and has added information about children and wives, which belongs to the respective article, so I have removed it.

~~ Phoe talk ~~ 13:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to remove the categorisation of the above page as 'Dukedoms in the Peerage of England' and 'Dukedoms in the Peerage of Scotland', and re-categorise it simply as 'Dukedoms'. Duke of Richmond is categorised as the former and Duke of Lennox is categorised as the latter. Categorising Duke of Richmond and Lennox suggests that it is one 'double-barrelled' dukedom, similar to Duke of York and Albany or Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, which it is not. Alekksandr (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]