Talk:Dusk... and Her Embrace
| WikiProject Albums | (Rated Start-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Black Metal | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Copies of this album sold
I don't think this album has sold half a million copies. Are there any reliable sources on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.4.198 (talk) 22:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Duskandh2.jpg
Image:Duskandh2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sources
If someone could get some sources in here that would be great. Chipthief00 (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Variant covers
Both of these have the correct fair use rationales, and both are mentioned in the actual article, meaning that they're not simply included for decoration. They do not, as far as I can see, violate Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, and their omission is detrimental to the page, since it means significant visual information is missing. They WERE in violation of the thumbnail rule however, so have now been added to the box. If you disagree with this, Cannibaloki, please explain.
Er... and I can't find the tildes on my new keyboard... User: Cardinal Wurzel, 17/5/09, 15:51 GMT.
- Very simple, acording with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria: Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. I do not need all the covers of several different versions which this album was released.--Cannibaloki 18:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I actually can read. I just don't agree with your interpretation of the rules. Mentioning that there was a special edition that came in a coffin, and then illustrating that, doesn't seem to me to contravene the guidelines. The normal cover doesn't convey equivalent information, since you can't infer from it what the coffin packaging looked like. But whatever, if you care that strongly, do what you like. I'm not going to get in an edit war about it. Just out of interest, do you actually contribute to articles or just police them randomly? I find that really fascinating. I'm sure there's a PhD in the psychology of Wikipedians. :-) User: Cardinal Wurzel, 21/5/09, 19:39 GMT.
