Talk:Dyadic kinship term

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

[Untitled][edit]

"Dyadic blood kin terms are absent from Indo-European languages with the exception of Icelandic and Faroese"

How about German 'Geschwister'?

How is that different from "siblings" in English? — kwami (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dyadic kinship term. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920071406/http://conferences.arts.usyd.edu.au/program.php?cf=19 to http://conferences.arts.usyd.edu.au/program.php?cf=19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two issues[edit]

Esperanto has a special prefix ge- (taken from German, like the 'Geschwister' mentioned above), to show both-sex parties, like 'gefratoj' (brother(s) and sister(s)), but it may relate also to 'not blood kinship', like or 'gepatroj' (parents = mother and father), or 'geamikoj' (friends of both sexes). Is the first relation mentioned by me a dyadic kinship?
BTW I don't see how 'co-mothers-in-law' could be an exaple of a wrod representing a dyadic kinship either in the sense of "blood kinship" or in the sense of "the relationship between individuals as they relate one to the other". "in-lawship" certainly isn't an example of "blook kinship". And one mother-in-law certainly isn't "mother-in-law" to the other mother oin law. Maybe the definitions in the article, or the examples, should be reconsidered and the article rewritten? noychoH (talk) 23:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]