Talk:Dynamical time scale

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dynamical and Free-Fall Time[edit]

The article seems to indicate that dynamical and free-fall times are the same. However, they are not. The article should be changed to reflect this. Privong (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you know how they differ, change the article. --Neo (talk) 08:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Astrophysics Formula[edit]

The formula was recently changed to $\tau _{dynamical}\simeq {\frac {R}{v}}={\sqrt {\frac {R^{3}}{2GM}}}$ by an anon. I have in my Astronomy notes that the formula is equal to $\tau _{dyn}\simeq {\sqrt {\frac {R^{3}}{GM}}}\simeq {\frac {1}{\sqrt {G\langle \rho \rangle }}}$ . Does anyone know which one is right? I can't seem to find a reference for one way or the other. --pie4all88 (talk) 08:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]