Talk:E-Tools

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 August 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

e-Tools Grassroots Efforts[edit]

There has been discussion on other mediation boards regarding the addition of the section on the new grassroots effort to enhance and support e-Tools for D&&D 3.5e. Please review the comments that have been added in that section and provide your feedback so that the community can reach a consensus on whether the information is appropriate for a Wikipedia article.Paul2924 (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have still not provided an independent source. You must provide an independently written, reliable source. We need this source not only to verify the content, but to balance it in terms of the proper weight: Your version has a pheonomena that's only a few days old taking up 1/3 of the article. We need an independent journalist to put this in the proper context so we know, per policy, how detail should be written about this on the Wikipedia article. - MrOllie (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References have been provided that qualify under the Wiki Policy. Please state specific "black letter" law that it violates. Your continued removal of the material prior to reaching a consensus on this topic is in violation of Wiki Policy and your single person opinion DOES NOT CONSTITUTE consensus. Please let's hear from others involved in the Role Playing Project before you further vandalize the page.Paul2924 (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, can you be very specific about which reference you think qualifies? It looks to me like you added a ref to DriveThruRPG from 2006, which can't possibly be a reference for your efforts because the release predates them by about seven years. You have also cited your own release notes, which are not independently written. Since you're new here, I'll also point out that the standard practice is that content like this remains off the page until there is consensus to include it. - MrOllie (talk) 11:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]