 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
(Newest comments to the bottom)
[edit] Facebook
Hello. Should the following be placed in the article?
- May 5, 2011 on ZENN's Facebook page their spokeswoman Catherine Scrimgeour said, "the Coimpany remains pleased with EEStor's progress. While I understand that it is frustrating that the progress EEStor is making has not been made public, they are indeed making progress and ZMC is confident they will be successful in commercializing their technology."
63.3.15.130 (talk) 03:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, because Facebook is a social networking site, not a reliable news source. If EESTOR had a real product, they'd have shown it by now. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
-
- Ian Clifford, CEO of ZMC has been making the same statement Catherine Scrimgeour posted on FB the last 5 years, EESTor is making progress, they will be successful in commercializing their technology. The fact is there in NO EESU from EESTor. If you come back in ten years and read this discussion page, CS, Ian Clifford, and the pumpers of EESTor will be making the same statement.--Shoshola (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Potential Investors
Hello. When talking about Jim Miller in "Battery Breakthrough?" reference, the following information is not in the referenced material, "visited EEStor to evaluate the technology for potential investors." Unless someone can find a reference stating he evaluated the technology for potential investors, I'm going to delete this portion. Thank you. 63.3.15.130 (talk) 17:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
