This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards?
Please list them so this article can improve. If no, will be removing tag. J. D. Redding 20:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC) (PS. it been tagged for a year without commnent.)
The lead is vague to the point of vacuity.
The article body is an arbitrary-seeming grab-bag of WP:FRINGE claims without either sources, underlying commonality (other than rejection by mainstream science), or in many cases any direct connection to the 'Earth' in the topic's title.
Per above suggestions, formally proposing merge with Ley line. One notion, really, no need to go through the same explanation twice. Itsmejudith (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Support: neither topic seems to have much WP:SECONDARY coverage, so combining them should bring a small improvement on that front. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 15:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Support per the above reasoning. Vsmith (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Oppose related concepts, but one is effectively the superset of the other, and they are sufficiently different to justify two articles. Some rewriting to make the relationship clearer may be required. Artw (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Oppose I am going to be working on this article, I will add many references. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 17:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)