Talk:Ecuadorian general election, 2006

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Ecuador Low‑importance

	Ecuador portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Comment[edit]

This needs a section on the failure of E-Vote's quick-count and the resulting concerns about fraud. Can someone who speaks Spanish (I don't) summarise the local reporting? IdiotSavant 20:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps[edit]

Feel free to use my maps of the election in Ecuador, with the proper respect to the author's right of course http://www.electoralgeography.com/en/countries/e/ecuador/

Naming convention[edit]

I would like to resurrect my previous idea to change the current naming convention for elections. The current convention is:

Use the format "Demonym type election, date", for example "Canadian federal election, 1867"... (WP:NAME#Elections}

I propose this is changed to allow two alternatives, as follows:

Use either this form: political division type election, date, or this form: political division election of date. For example, Canadian federal election, 1867 or Canadian federal election of 1867. Where an article has been created using one form, do not move the article to the other form.

This new option would make linking more natural and make the article names more encyclopedic.

Please comment on this proposal at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#New elections proposal

Thanks AndrewRT(Talk) 23:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]