Talk:Efficient XML Interchange
|WikiProject Software / Computing||(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Internet||(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)|
I think that this article satisfy the notability guidelines:
- it is a W3C draft about an important subject in the XML technology: the definition of a binary XML format
- there are a lot of companies in the working group: Siemens, Fujitsu, Sun Microsystems, Intel, Nokia, Adobe, IBM, etc... which shows the importance of the subject for these companies. Hervegirod 21:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. I'm removing the notice. —Pengo 22:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note that it was added before the first draft was published and at a very early stage of the article  —Pengo 23:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Encoding and decoding speeds are both improved with Efficient XML
Why was most implementations removed? Including every C/C++ implementation?
This makes EXI seam disadvantageous compared to other Binary XML formats that have more listed implementations.
Also the text was changed stating that two implementations exist, which is not true. I do understand that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but this statement makes me think that the other implementations was removed by some other reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)