Talk:Ehsan Jami

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Spam[edit]

He was a muslim. He is ex-muslim because he was a SHIA, SHI'ISM is ISLAM,

This man is responsible for the production of an anti-islamic movie about the prophets wives. The main concern of the film is the prophets wife 'Aisha' who coincidentally is the main concern of pedophiles. So this is shia propaganda under the cover of 'Ex-muslim' as they claim.

It is claimed by numerous sources that he is sent by Iran and the shia republic to deform the true image of Islam and the image of the prophets beloved wife Aisha.

Therefore many are boycotting Iran alongside Dutch products.

Found the above. Saw fit to remove it, as it seems like propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.90.43.141 (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion[edit]

Undeletion is being discussed here : Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_9#Ehsan_Jami. Baronnet 23:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock terms.[edit]

"Inspired by the attacks of 9/11 in 2001, Jami took a special interest in the Qur'an and Hadith and studied both, after which he concluded he didn't identify with either. Jami felt deeply disappointed when he learned about, what he believes to be, the true nature of the Prophet Muhammad, describing him as a "criminal"[3] A realisation that would come to have a dramatic effect on his career. Together with Loubna Berrada (founder of the Advisory Committee for Integration, part of the right-wing Liberal party), Jami founded the Central Committee for Ex-Muslims in 2007.[4] The organisation aims to break through the Islamic taboo on apostasy (which is believed, in many Islamic circles, to be a grave sin punishable by death) as well as aide Muslims who wish to abandon their faith. Berrada left the committee shortly after it was founded because she felt Jami challenged Islam itself too much, saying: "I don't wish to confront Islam itself. I only want to spread the message that Muslims should be allowed to leave Islam behind without being threatened"[5]"

sock of banned user - post removed.Proabivouac 08:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

quite a number, unfortunately. i have attempted to reduce the skewed language. ITAQALLAH 19:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Atheism[edit]

I removed Atheism from the persons profile where it said "religion" simply because atheism is not a religion anymore than bald is a haircolor. There is no point in having it their. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.198.86 (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not an ex-Muslim[edit]

His parents are ex Muslims as such he was never a Muslim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IslamicrevialistmMujahid (talkcontribs) 11:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ehsan Jami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]