|While the Biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see the biographies of living persons noticeboard.|
|Ideal sources for Wikipedia's medical content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Eisenmenger's syndrome.
|WikiProject Medicine / Cardiology||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
I think the chapter on pathogenesis is wrong. In true Eisenmenger's, where the defect is post-tricuspidal, the right ventricle probably never loses it's muscular "neonatal" appearance. It's also probable that the physiologically pulmonary hypertension of the newborn perseveres in a lot of these cases, see: Hopkins WE. The remarkable right ventricle of patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16:19-25. --Ekko 17:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Lists of names
Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Name listed with no verifiable citations have been removed, please do not replace without verifiable citations. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Mention Right Ventricular Hypertension in Pathogenesis?
Hi, i think to make the explanation of the shunt reversal clearer, we could mention right ventricular hypertrophy before the sentence starting "Eventually, ...". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 15:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
English translation of diagram
I think the diagram used should have an English translation, to make it more easily interpretable by the reader on the English Wikipedia - I could volunteer to make one, but I would be using a translator program. --Sphecidae (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)