 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hertfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Untitled
Is Enfield (1893) F.C. really a "completely new club", as this article claims? I mean, in 1986 Middlesbrough went into administration and were officially/legally re-formed as Middlesbrough (1986) F.C., but nobody treats the post-1986 version as a separate club. If, however, it's felt that Enfield (1893) really is a completely separate club, then it should have its own, separate, WP article. Currently this article can't seem to decide which way to play it - the infobox makes it look like the club's defunct, but the current ESL template is on there and the article isn't in the "defunct clubs" category..... ChrisTheDude 07:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Neither of the external links seems to think that it is a new club, even though it is officially and legally. The Football Club History Database has just continued the page for Enfield, even though it normally starts a new page when a club changes its name, and EFC Fans also just continues, mentioning a 'restart' and a change of name. Perhaps the article should stay neutral by mentioning both points of view. Coyets 19:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Enfield (1893) F.C. is indeed a new club under FA rules. New entity = new club. 1893 is not a full or associate member of the FA because that membership was attached to the now defunct club and the Official Receiver refused to allow the football club to be demerged from the bankrupt group company. Jancyclops (talk) 21:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Notable Enfield F.C. players
Someone has added a template in the Notable Enfield F.C. players stating that there are no obvious criteria for inclusion. Would the following two criteria be sensible? Either at least one appearance in League football or at least 20 amateur or semi-professional international caps. Coyets (talk) 15:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- There were some notable former players of the now defunct Enfield FC but the new club has only been going since 2007 and at Step 5 which hasn't given them time for players to progress into the Football League/Premiership/whatever.Jancyclops (talk) 21:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] London wiki
There is a 'wanted page' request for Enfield FC on London Wiki - www.london.wikia.com : anyone care to oblige in creating it? Jackiespeel (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
