From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. |
|
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the biographies of living persons noticeboard. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
 |
This page was previously nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 |
An individual covered by or significantly related to this article has edited Wikipedia as Eloquence (talk · contribs) |
[edit] The never-ending debate on this article
Someone wants to redirect it again, based on the results of a 2+ year old AfD. Any new arguments for reversing the recreation from a year ago? [[User:Ed Wood's Wig|]] (talk) 03:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, a tremendous amount of work has been done on the article since the last deletion discussion about it. At the very least, this would merit a new AfD discussion, not a unilateral action with no discussion. Cirt (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- A unilateral action with no discussion? You mean like re-creating it following a deletion discussion? :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 01:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- The article has been in existence and stable in much the same version for easily over a year, and has involved the positive contributions of multiple Wikipedia editors. So yes, simply redirecting it with zero discussion about that is a unilateral action and inappropriate. Cirt (talk) 14:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
A three-year old discussion does not carry a lot of weight, especially once you realise that it concerned a completely different article. The current article must stay until consensus determines otherwise —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.107.184 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)