Talk:Evelyn Hernandez

Untitled

I have nominated this article for deletion because I do not believe that the subject is notable. The notability guideline explicitely states the following:

3. Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered.

Facts to support my assertion:

1. This article appears to be a memorial, and does not offer a reason that this case is more significant than any of the other 93 murders committed in San Francisco or the 16,204 in the Unisted States that year. (see [1] and [2])
2. The article provides an external link that suggests that this type of murder is not uncommon: Police say murder of pregnant women is not uncommon [3]
3. The article also states that: Friends and family of Hernandez tried to get Hernandez's case featured on America's Most Wanted, but were rejected because no warrant had been issued for a suspect.
4. Only two articles link this one: a dab page for the name Evelyn, and the List of Murdered People.
5. Most of the references provided where originally published in a span of 3 days (April 21 - 23, 2002), one of those requires the article to be purchased in order to be readThe Globe & Mail April 22, 2003, and another is from a blog A debate on the media coverage.

Srice13 15:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• The Evelyn Hernandez case was reported by NPR (6:39 on the report), Court TV, NBC, MSNBC, ABC News, Philippine News, The Seattle Times, Univision, CBS and CNN. The Hernandez case was written about in Presumed Guilty: What the Jury Never Knew About Laci Peterson's Murder and Why Scott Peterson Should Not Be on Death Row. These are but a few of the reports. There are a few reasons why her case is of interest. One: Her case has many similarities to the Peterson case, leading some to believe Scott Peterson is innocent. Two: An argument can be made, by contrasting the cases, that Americans prefer a soap opera murder if it involves white people, but not if it includes immigrants. Kingturtle 02:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• Sadly there is truth to what you say, but it goes deeper than that. If Laci and Scott weren't telegenic nobody would had heard of this. --Kevin Murray 04:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The links provided in Kingturtle's arguement all place Hernandez in the context of Peterson. That is a good argument that the Peterson case is not notable either. There are many things covered by the media that are not encyclodic fodder. I am dropping my resistance to this article becuase it is realy not that important to me. I do think the Wiki community needs to refine the notion of notablility. This case is not notable because of Hernandez; it is notable as an example of race bias in the media (which was not the theme of the article when I proposed deletion).SRICE_{13 (TALK | EDITS)} 03:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:Death Commentary

I have tagged this article with WP: Death and assessed it Start-class. I recommend that the article title should be changed to Death of Evelyn Hernandez, because the topic of the article is primarily about the death of Ms. Hernandez and the subsequent investigation, and not about any notable accomplishments during her lifetime. This would be in-line with other articles in which the individual's death was the event that propelled the name to notability. See for example Murder of Laci Peterson (because a suspect was found guilty of murder) or Death of Caylee Anthony (no suspect was found guilty of murder). Boneyard90 (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2011 (UTC)