Talk:Evolution of the Mollusca
|WikiProject Animals||(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Palaeontology||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
Why is this "Mollusc's evolution" and not something more traditional, like "Evolution of the molluscs" or "Molluscan evolution". As it stands now, the title is rather clumsy-sounding, and, as someone who has studied the evolution of molluscs for 12 years I can't say I have ever heard of anyone say "Mollusc's evolution"! Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 10:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am not English native speaker. You can change the name as you wish. --Snek01 11:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Since this is a page about the 'evolution of Mollusca', I would like to see the established dates for the different types of Mollusk.
I did find some reference to different types
but no dates. --Captain twotoo 17:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Captain twotoo 17:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I removed one of the cladograms as it was duplicated many times - this just led to unnecessary confusion.
Cladograms and merging
Why is the first cladogram written in text when the second is shown in proper format? Can someone of greater knowledge convert the first one for better reading and simplicity? In addition, if this is an article about the evolution of Mollusca, then I am curious as to why this information cannot be merged with the Mollusca article (or whatever it is titled)? This article has no text talking about the evolution. It is just diagrams. Andrew Colvin • Talk 07:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)