Talk:FK Shkëndija

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Republic of Macedonia  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Republic of Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Republic of Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Fair use rationale for Image:FK Shkendija 79.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:FK Shkendija 79.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Per UEFA source[edit]

The title should be FK Shkëndija 79 [1], therefore Local hero's move is incorrect and should be reverted. Furthermore, there are 900,000 googlehits with Shkëndija, 9 times as much as the current title.Llengari (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I only moved it back because it was moved without any reasons given. Also, it was changed to KF while your link says it's FK. Your explanation is good enough for me, so I moved it to FK Shkëndija 79. --Local hero talk 19:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

FK ShkëndijaKF ShkëndijaRelisted. Cloudz679 16:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC) – The official name of the club as can be seen in the club crest on its Wikipedia entry is KF Shkëndija, hence that should be the name on the wikipedia article for the club. Keli2006 (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Oppose for now - where exactly is this the case? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shkendlogonew.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Shkendlogonew.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


FK ShkëndijaKF Shkëndija — The club's official name (see official website). Relisted Armbrust The Homunculus 02:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.43.60 (talkcontribs) 13:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC).

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 18:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose The English-lang refs at the article refer to Shkendija Tetovo/Shkendija, FK Skendija and FK Skendija 79, so no evidence the proposed move is appropriate. Eldumpo (talk) 19:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.