Talk:Fable Legends

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Professor Hershel Layton (1 participant)
David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (4 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (5 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Koopa Troopa (8 participants)
Super Mutant (10 participants)
Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad (5 participants)
Police Trainer (0 participants; relisted)
Beam Invader (4 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (17 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (3 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (11 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (2 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (3 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Gelber (game designer) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Character[edit]

Why was the Heroes table reverted to the inaccurate information and marked inappropriate Please discuss before undoing again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddquest (talk • contribs) 03:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because the list is considered WP:GAMECRUFT, which is not appropriate to include. It is fine to mention the classes and their abilities, but what they these characters look like should never be mentioned. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Most of the descriptions where there already. I'll put back my changes without the descriptions. Would that be "Appropriate"? I believe Wikipedia edicate says that we're supposed to discuss things before getting into a undo war. I'm trying to do that but I'm not getting co-operation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddquest (talk • contribs) 17:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put a preview of what I'm thinking in my sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Toddquest/sandbox

Please let me know if it's ok to submit. Sorry for being new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddquest (talk • contribs) 17:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddquest: - Sorry for being late to reply. It is a good try, but a list of characters isn't really useful. It is something best presented in prose when it comes to classes, and a detailed list of character is not appropriate. Perhaps more description on what these classes are is more useful. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could we at least put that there are fourteen heroes instead of four since that's wrong. I really don't understand how a list is inappropriate sigh. Nevermind just leave the incorrect info this sucks :/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddquest (talk • contribs) 13:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not wrong. The text reads four Heroes and a Villain, which means the four heroes and villain in a match, not in the game. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fable Legends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of Cancellation[edit]

So the game was cancelled, but why does it say something about severs being closed on xxx date? Was it pre-release? Earl access? Was it cancelled after release? I feel like the intro needs to be explained a little more. Dohzer (talk) 16:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]