Talk:Fahrenheit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / Vital
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
 
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is a vital article.
WikiProject Meteorology (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meteorology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meteorology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Measurement (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Measurement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

This article has an assessment summary page.

Disambiguation[edit]

Not sure how good an idea it is to have a disambiguation page here - have you looked at the multitude of pages that link here, all for the temperature scale meaning? Someone's going to have to fix all those links if this is to remain a disambiguation page. Mkweise 03:28 Mar 7, 2003 (UTC)

I agree and I'm moving it back. The graphics API is not at all famous enough to cause a reasonable ambiguity over the use of "Fahrenheit". --mav 03:51 Mar 7, 2003 (UTC)
Done. I gave the API a disambiguation block even though very few people will actually use it. --mav
while we're at it, there's Fahrenheit by Dior (kidding) -- Tarquin 10:44 Mar 7, 2003 (UTC)

Common usage II[edit]

removed - "However, despite official attempts to displace it, Fahrenheit remains in use for everyday, non-scientific temperature measurement by the general population of many English-speaking countries out of habit."

As above. This does not hold true for much of the UK, and any of Australia or New Zealand. Additionally, virtually all non-english speaking countries use celcius. While I agree no critism is necessary/wanted or warrented of those countries which retain Fahrenheit, it's misleading to state the above.

Page name[edit]

Discussion moved to Talk:Units of measurement because it affects several units of measurement. bobblewik


99% of countries usa Celsius[edit]

I have reworded the sentence that contained the sentence "99% of countries". The "99%" is an over-estimate. If we countries in terms of UN memebership, the artcile cites four countries that use Fahrenheit, making 98% a more realistic number. If we work in terms of population, abput 5% of the world's population lives in the US. Moreover the sentence stated that this number of people changed to the Celsius scale durign the last part fo teh 20th century - not true - in many parts of the world, the Celsius scale was in use in the 19th century.-User:Martinvl (talk) 06:58, 27 February 2013

Second Paragraph - US Territories[edit]

The parenthetical exception in the second paragraph states that Puerto Rico predominantly uses Celsius. I believe this is mistaken, the temperature scale commonly used is Fahrenheit. It is the scale used for legislation, newspapers, as well as everyday use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.8.126 (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)