|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- Support (nominator) This page was located at Falcon Entertainment before it was speedy deleted. When it was re-created, it was created at its present location. Falcon Studios is a division of Falcon Entertainment, "Falcon Studios" should redirect to "Falcon Entertainment". In addition to its being the correct name of the company, this makes a huge amount of sense when you consider someone clicking a link for Jocks Studios. They should arrive at an article titled "Falcon Entertainment", not "Falcon Studios".—Chidom talk 03:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support per Chidom. Zeromacnoo 12:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Whoops, sorry about that. I don't think you're going to get too much opposition on this one. Thank you. -Todd(Talk-Contribs) 19:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
03 AUGUST 2007- reading this I see that most of the references is referring to Falcon's own websites which is basically the company or organization telling us about themselves. This needs to have better citations and non-original research!
Editing rationale 31 October
Many sources are either down or the material is not found in the citation given. That Falcon is the largest producer needs to be sourced; that it was founded by Holmes is not found in citation (page gone); that Scarborough owns Hot House is not found (he's Prez); that Rutherford owns Colt is not found (he's Prez and Exec Prod); that LaRue owns Channel 1 is not found (page gone); four areas including Falcon TV not found; prices of toys not found; second reference for toys leads to video catalog; three sections written like adverts for Falcon prods. I removed irrelevant additions, redlinks, and spam links.
This is just another example of mediocrity in porn-related articles. 18.104.22.168 20:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Falcon Entertainment Logo.png
Image:Falcon Entertainment Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.