Talk:Fall of the Ming Dynasty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Thinking this was a copyvio I googled... and found... much of the text was taken from Ming Dynasty.... so, it's just redundant it seems. gren グレン 00:26, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

That's where it originally came from.The Ming dynasty article was getting way to big and this material has been cut from there.Cetot 08:21, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

connotation of the term 'treachery' [edit]

The summary of the article has this phrase "which had fallen to the Manchu by treachery in 1621" the term 'treachery' seems pretty much emotional, rather than analytical, with a pro-Ming bias. Is there another way of saying the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.183.28.3 (talk) 22:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)