Talk:Fast mapping

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Psychology (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Linguistics / Applied Linguistics  (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Applied Linguistics Task Force.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

from VfD:


Fast mapping[edit]

Torn between transwiki to wiktionary, or deletion. It doesn't seem to be that widespread of a term.--ZayZayEM 11:24, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Transwiki It gets nearly 7,000 Google hits as an exact phrase. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:53, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep real term, not just a dicdef. Kappa 12:37, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep interesting, and has the potential to be come a much bigger article. Thryduulf 17:57, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, it's helpful. Wyss 21:20, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, needs expansion. Megan1967 02:29, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Encyclopedic value, potential to grow. JoaoRicardo 05:15, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Neologism. Most of those 7000 google hits refer to a different meaning. Niteowlneils 17:15, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • BAD LINK for reference to the study. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.95.56 (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

end moved discussion