 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
| |
|
|
|
|
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. |
|
|
|
Please add here, that the financial markets do not only consider stocks and bonds (which means interest rates), but also currencies and commodities. These four categories being traded at bourses (exchanges) make up the whole cosmos of the markets. Note that there are appr. 250 futures traded at the future exchanges of the world, among them all four categories. I try to cover these four categories on a daily basis on [EarningCharts.COM] at the price of a donut. Hannes Tilgner
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Important Concepts
I am thinking of adding "Expected Utility Theory" to this section's list of concepts, shall I?--Forich (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Clutter
This article has far too many external links and "See also" wiki-links. The links take up more space than the article text. I strongly recommend removing the less-essential links. --JHP (talk) 12:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
