Talk:Finjan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computer Security / Computing   
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 
WikiProject Computing  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


This page sounds like an advertisment... "Finjan's unmatched technlogy"... requires a substantial re-write or elimination. 59.183.156.48 (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

They are pretty big name behind the stage. A lot of antivirus software vendors and security appliance makers licence their tech and sell it under their own name or implement them as a module in their own system. Certainly notable company in IT-security. 82.131.210.162 11:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I searched Yahoo! and found 571,000 results. Sounds notable. MalwareSmarts 20:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I searched Google and found 333,000 results. My analysis confirms that Finjan is not notable, and the article should be eliminated. This also lacks citations. --198.22.236.230 (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Finjan saved my life. --198.22.236.230 (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

About being unmatched - although it sounds like a commercial script, note that if that was the case what should really written? Check out the issue of the patent jury decision, which seems to put it in an unmatched position currently. As for being a big or small name, does it really matter? Is Wikipedia biased to size or magnitude of an entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.92.238 (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)