From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Top |
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Sections with no replies in 90 days are automatically moved. |
[edit] Does an appeal of Guantanamo captive Ali Al Bahlul's verdict, on 1st amendment grounds, merit coverage here?
Guantanamo captive Ali al-Bahlul's military defense attorneys filed a fifty page appeal of his sentence on first amendment grounds: "Mr. al Bahlul is not a sympathetic defendant. He embraces an ideology that glorifies violence, justifies terrorism and opposes constitutional democracy. As offensive as it may be, [Bahlul's film work] is speech that falls within the core protections of the First Amendment, which forbids the prosecution of `the thoughts, the beliefs, the ideals of the accused."
So, does this appeal merit coverage in this article?
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- I would add it to the article once there has been a ruling on the appeal. SMP0328. (talk) 23:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- I concur with SMP0328. Lawyers argue crazy things all the time on appeal but it's really the judicial decisions on those appeals that matter in the long run (and become notable enough for mention on Wikipedia). --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Exemptions
Surely an exemption section is required detailing where the First Amendment doesn't apply, e.g. certain obscene/pornographic material (Miller test), matters of national security, and supporting the boycott of Israel. The Patriot Act reduction on civil liberties would also affect the freedoms afforded by the First Amendment, should this be mentioned here? Zarcadia (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)