Talk:Fizzball

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (6 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Large article change

OK, OK, OK. I had this article NOT as a stub, but then someone went and shortened it to TWO SENTENCES! Now it's a stub and very uninformative. At least my article gave information on the game. I was on a vacation and planning on making it POV neutral when I got back, but noooooooooooo... You guys went and changed it before I had a chance. I'm lodging a complaint. Excuse my temper, but it's kind of unfair. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shoveldude (talk • contribs) 22:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It should not be deleted because it doesn't fit any of the terms described in the warning. It's an article about a game, not a blog or anything...

Notability

A Google search for FizzBall game does turn up a good number of hits, including [1] and [2] though I'm not sure these really meet the requirements to really establish notability. I'm rather indifferent as to whether the article should be kept, but if it is it needs a rewrite. -- Hawaiian717 18:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I guess I agree with you. Just tell me what needs editing and I'll fix it.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fizzball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120731061341/http://steelpennygames.com/portsconversions to http://steelpennygames.com/portsconversions

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]