Talk:Floating point

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing / CompSci (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (marked as Top-importance).

imho, the computation for Pi as shown actually computes only Pi/2[edit]

The algorithm as shown to compute an approximation of Pi actually computes imo in this form only Pi/2, even while the output shown contains an approximation for Pi. I think either the values should be halved or the formula should be changed into : 12 * 2^i * t_i KeesLem (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Zuse's Z3 floating-point format[edit]

There are contradictory documents about the size and the significand (mantissa) size of the floating-point format of Zuse's Z3. According to Pr Horst Zuse, this is 22 bits, with a 15-bit significand (implicit bit + 14 represented bits). There has been a recent anonymous change of the article, based on unpublished Raúl Rojas's work, but I wonder whether this is reliable. Raúl Rojas was already wrong in the Bulletin of the Computer Conservation Society Number 37, 2006 about single precision (he said 22 bits for the mantissa). Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Error in diagram[edit]

The image "Float mantissa exponent.png" erroneously shows that 10e-4 is the exponent, while the exponent actually is only -4 and the base is 10. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

needs simpler overview[edit]

put it this way, I'm an IT guy and I can't understand this article, there need to be a much simpler summery for non tech people, using simple English. Right now every other word is another tech term I don't fully understand.

thanks, Wikipedia Lover & Supporter