Talk:Florida Strikers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (marked as Low-importance).
 

Requested move 20 October 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Fort Lauderdale Strikers (1994–97)Florida Strikers – If this was the name they went by before folding, than it should be the title of this page. relisted Andrewa (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Michael (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Even more evidence that you don't know enough about the history of the club (this is an observation). NYCWikiKid (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
  • This page needs further development. It was a great start and has existed here for preservation until others could come along and expand the work. There are three teams here from one set. It needs to be detailed. That is what some of us are currently trying to doing. Kindly let us finish the work and then you can come back here and "critique", or rather be more inclined to explore more about the history of the club. Thank you. NYCWikiKid (talk) 12:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. – Michael (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - correct name of team. GiantSnowman 10:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - per GS. Fenix down (talk) 09:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

Relisting[edit]

The page has already had one move [1] and it appears that this team had at least three names

but are only likely to have one article covering all three periods.

I'm concerned at the personal attack above, which has been reverted once (not by me) and just reinstated together with another one this time in the edit summary [2], and at related suggestions of ownership. I have raised this on the relevant user talk page.

But mainly, the RM has been raised and a case made (perhaps not the best that could be made, but one that has had one support vote and deserves an answer), and no valid reason or evidence has been produced as to why the article should not be moved as proposed. Relisting to allow this to be provided (or not). Andrewa (talk) 02:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Previous discussion[edit]

See Talk:Tampa Bay Rowdies#New name. Andrewa (talk) 03:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.