Talk:Forced labor of Hungarians in the Soviet Union
| WikiProject Soviet Union | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
A fact from Forced labor of Hungarians in the Soviet Union appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 23 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 1191 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
|
|
Unclear meaning [edit]
Some of this text did not employ very good English. I corrected the typos and improved the English where the meaning was transparent. However, I found the following incomprehensible
- It was followed by break until May 1947. Last some 3,000 people returned after Stalin's death, during 1953-1955. Hungarian sources estimate that 330,000-380,000 persons returned in total, giving an estimate of about 200,000 perished in transit and in captivity.
Do you mean to say "There was a lull in returns until May 1947. The last to come back were some 3,000 people, returned after Stalin's death, during 1953-1955. Hungarian sources estimate that 330,000-380,000 persons returned in total, giving an estimate of about 200,000 for those who perished in transit and in captivity".? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 15:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Mikkalai [edit]
Mikkalai, would you care to explain why you keep reverting my separation of references and footnotes? See Wikipedia:Edit_summaries#Recommendations, WP:Edit warring as well as Wikipedia:Etiquette, for reason why you ought to explain yourself in edit summaries when reverting content. You're also on the verge of breaching WP:3RR. Merging the footnotes and references section is ugly and confusing. Please read Wikipedia:Footnotes#Style_recommendations, Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Section_headings and Wikipedia:MoS#Section_management for the relevant guidelines. I'm restoring this version. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- I see you have made an approach to fixing this while I was posting. Thanks, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)