Talk:Forests of Australia

Forestry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Forests of Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 12 May 2014 for a period of one week.

Significant[edit]

By what criteria? this could be a significantly misleading list unless further qualification is made - considering the level of science in the RFA's for each state - this list is potentially a trainwreck unless further criteria are addressed please - Satu Suro 02:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, criteria and descriptions needs to be added, along with references and topic sections. This is a starting point for the article - more details and information to follow. Each article in the list contains information on its significant forest(s). Peter Campbell 07:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

arrgghhh please make sure whenever you say significant forests please realise there is a potential issue in a whole range of contexts - qualifying why and how should be an important aim in such work - cheers Satu Suro 07:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be even more pesky and say maybe at least 2 or 3 qulifiers in the table if possible - maybe not now but a possible future addition Satu Suro 13:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To include?[edit]

How about the two ecoregions, Queensland tropical rain forests and Eastern Australian temperate forests, should they be included? - Shiftchange (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Shiftchange: That would be a welcome addition. I would encourage you to add those in there. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 16:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forests of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604211106/http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/publications/series/forest-profiles to http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/publications/series/forest-profiles

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Significant[edit]

More content about forest coverage, trends and data across Australia[edit]

To include?[edit]

External links modified[edit]