Talk:Fort Victoria (British Columbia)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag[edit]

while the HBC flag is valid for the HBC, of course, given the title of the Crown Colony section, and his dual capacity as Chief Factor and as Governor, the flag of the Colony of Vancouver Island should also be here, no?Skookum1 (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Designated a National Historic Site?[edit]

This seems to imply that the structure is still standing. AFAIK, the only thing remaining is a mooring ring. Shouldn't there be something in the article about its dismantling? fishhead64 (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A fuller material history of the fort is much wanting; I think it was torn down, overwhelmed by what is now "Olde Towne"/Old Victoria/Chinatown, sometime in the 1870s or even before; details of its structure and components and such, and more about its origin and location and other history like the bit about Tzouhalem here - and the transformation from a colonial fur capital to a booming town of 30,000 in one week....probably the most important fort history in BC to consider towards an FA or GA, the other would be Ft McLeod or Ft St James; maybe Fts Simpson, but given Victoria's primacy, it should in the long run have as much coverage as Ft Langley...even if unlike the latter it's not there anymore; and hasn't been in a long time. (right now the Fort Simpson-as-a-historical-fort article doesn't exist separately from Lax Kw'aalams) Skookum1 (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, being a National Historic Site doesn't imply a building; Yuquot is such a place, so are Silverdale, Hills Bar and Craigellachie. Well, at Craigellachie there's a cairn, true....Boat Encampment is also an NHS I think; and there's nothing there at all, other than maybe a sign like at Hills Bar and Craigellachie.Skookum1 (talk) 13:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Victoria (British Columbia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]