This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
I would suggest that we change the image of the emperor at the top of the page. Is there perhaps a better/more flattering image?--Karl franz josef (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a beauty contest. Si Trew (talk) 07:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
True, but if his wife Elizabeth of Bavaria is show at around 18, it would be nice if his picture is similar/consistent. Peacedance (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Fifty-six years of his political career missing
The is a section entitled Imperial absolutism, 1848–1860, which is resonably well written. But after that there is not a word on what sort of rule there was for the remaining 56 years of his reign. That is rather a large and serious hole! Is there anybody watching this with the knowledge to write even a brief section on the rest of his political career? Scolaire (talk) 09:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Why did he carry the title Franz Josef the First, when there was no future emperor of the same name? Are you sure this is correct? Valetude (talk) 08:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
In short; a monarch can give themselves any number they like; it doesn't neccesarily follow that 'there have been x number of monarchs with this name, therefore this monarch should have this number', because this is part of the royal prerogative. Yes, it usually follows the convention that 'if there have been x number of monarchs, you have that number after your name', but sometimes monarchs go against this convention, often for political or historical considerations.
To wit: if Franz Joseph I decided he the Franz Joseph I, then he was, just as much as if he had decided (for whatever reason) that he wanted to be called Franz Joseph II or Franz Joseph III.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
There is a wikipedia article on regnal numbers; "the first" is sometimes but not always used by the first person to have that name. I notice mention (above, regarding Australia) of Elizabeth II -- that is using the regnal number of the BRITISH queen; apparently, British domains did not include Australia during the time of the 1st Queen Elizabeth (who was retroactively given the "I" in 1952). As for Franz Joseph of Austria, sometimes I see the "I" and sometimes I do not. Because the Austrian empire was broken up at end of what we now call World War I, there wasn't much chance for another Franz Joseph to become ruler.
In 1885 Franz Joseph met Katharina Schratt, a leading actress of the Vienna stage, and she became his mistress.
I don't believe it's ever been established that they had a physically intimate relationship. Frederic Morton, in A Nervous Splendor: Vienna, 1888-1889 (Penguin, 1980), and Thunder at Twilight: Vienna 1913/1914 (Scribner's, 1989), asserts the relationship remained platonic. On page 85 of the latter, he writes: "...Franz Joseph and Frau Schratt continued to be lovers in everything but raw fact. They never met between the sheets."
Our entry on Katharina Schratt describes her as a "confidante" of Franz Joseph. German Wiki's article on her refers only to their "friendship" (die Freundschaft zwischen Katharina Schratt und Kaiser Franz Joseph).
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Franz Joseph I of Austria → Franz Joseph – He was not only the ruler of Austria. I should think his rule of Austria-Hungary is more significant than his rule prior to 1867. The proposed name is already a redirect here. I dropped the numeral because there is no Franz Joseph II, but I'd have no problem keeping it. Srnec (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose. The name of the article is fine as it is. Calling it merely "Franz Joseph" it's definitely odd. Are we going to repeat the dumb Queen Victoria? Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor was just as known as Carlos I of Spain, are we going to change that as well? Monarchs' articles should have the domain designation on their titles. Either way, the Austrian emperors' domains were generally called "Austria" for simplicity sake from that time to the present day. What you should be worried is to improve the article and bring it to Featured Article level. --Lecen (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose, if anything, it should be moved to Francis Joseph I of Austria or Francis Joseph I of Austria and Hungary. GoodDay (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Support, please. Get rid of the ridiculous extensions of the names! RedSlash 22:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose because it is usual.--Yopie (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose This is a borderline case, but pre-emptive disambiguation of monarchs is not to be abandoned lightly, even if they are the primary or only meaning, and I agree that we have gone too far with recent British monarchs. Although he is the best-known Franz Joseph, he is not quite a household name these days, and we also have Franz Joseph II of Liechtenstein, who reigned for 51 years and only died in 1989. PatGallacher (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Comment Franz Joseph used to be a disambiguation page . It was merged to Franz Joseph (disambiguaiton) in 2007 , so per WP:MAD the edit history needs to be kept around, so if this is moved, the destination's edit history from 2007 and older needs to be preserved, such as moving the page to a placeholder location (ie. Franz-Joseph (something with no significant edit history) or somesuch) -- 22.214.171.124 (talk) 06:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I thought "of Austria" referred to his birthplace, not his domain? --126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.