Talk:Frederic Thesiger, 1st Viscount Chelmsford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lord Chelmsford - Australian diplomat?[edit]

On the question on whether Lord Chelmsford should be considered an Australian diplomat I think he can be considered one as he held the office of Agent-General of New South Wales in London, a diplomatic post. He wasn't an 'Australian' in the strictest sense, I grant you, but as he held an Australian diplomatic post then surely he is considered an 'Australian' diplomat. Your thoughts...Siegfried Nugent (talk) 09:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, interesting. I'm surprised Jack Lang of all people would have chosen a former Viceroy of India and a pillar of the British establishment to represent NSW's interests in Whitehall.
OK, so he was a diplomat for Australia, but not himself an Australian. I know of no similar case, do you?
Line-ball, I guess. Feel free to restore the cat. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 09:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha no probs. I was pretty surprised too when I was researching him for the page and found that. I guess it's just one of those interesting quirks of history that pop up from time to time.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 10:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederic Thesiger, 1st Viscount Chelmsford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Retirement' from political life in 1924?[edit]

I would agree with the citation need raised against the statement he retired from political life following the fall of the first British Labour government in 1924. He was only 56, and a recently promoted hereditary peer. It would be a believable statement if it were proved he took no further part in House of Lords business.Cloptonson (talk) 09:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]