Talk:Free Wheelchair Mission

Free Wheelchair Mission is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

I originally created this article, and was not sure how to cite my source. The information came from the webstie of the Free Wheelchair Mission, which is why I included the web address in the article. I did not straight copy any text, but I did use the website as an information source. Is there a better way to cite this? Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you!

orangehatbrune 02:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In principle it is better to source content from reliable secondary sources such as news reports and articles about the organisation and its products and work, rather than using information published by the subject itself. If you can divide the article into sections such as information on the organisation itself, its history and another on its product(s) and the way it operates would be a good start. You also need to assert the notability of the subject in the introduction (why it deserves to have an article). Try to maintain a neutral point of view as well as tone (be careful not to praise them with uneccessary adjectives). Roger (talk) 16:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]