|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frequency analysis article.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|Frequency analysis received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.|
I was not aware that "TH" was an "exceedingly uncommon" letter combination in English. Apparently people very rarely use words such as "the", "this", "there", and "that".
The page mentions "TH" as common, not uncommon
- Actually, at the time I wrote the above, the text said, "Likewise, ST, NG and QU are common combinations, while TH, XT, NZ and QJ are exceedingly uncommon, or "impossible"." So you see, it did list TH as uncommon. However, looking back on it I should have just edited the article. My only defense is that this was over 2 years ago. Roachmeister 14:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
"XT" isn't "impossible" either. Look at the word "extra"...
Edit the page if you find errors in it then.
The spelling misteaks was deliberate as a self illustration. Should be put back? Perhaps italicized? ww 15:12, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that spelling "mistake" as "misteak" really increases the credibility of Wikipedia as a reference work...— Matt 19:44, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Just solved the example for fun and decided that it'd be even more fun to spoil it for others. So here's the plaintext:
HEREUPONLEGRANDAROSEWITHAGRAVEANDSTATELYAIRANDBROUGHTMETHEBEETLEFROMAGLASSCASEI NWHICHITWASENCLOSEDITWASABEAUTIFULSCARABAEUSANDATTHATTIMEUNKNOWNTONATURALISTSOF COURSEAGREATPRIZEINASCIENTIFICPOINTOFVIEWTHEREWERETWOROUNDBLACKSPOTSNEARONEEXTR EMITYOFTHEBACKANDALONGONENEARTHEOTHERTHESCALESWEREEXCEEDINGLYHARDANDGLOSSYWITHA LLTHEAPPEARANCEOFBURNISHEDGOLDTHEWEIGHTOFTHEINSECTWASVERYREMARKABLEANDTAKINGALL THINGSINTOCONSIDERATIONICOULDHARDLYBLAMEJUPITERFORHISOPINIONRESPECTINGIT
I guess it's meant to be split this way into sentences:
Here upon Legrand. Arose with a grave and stately air and brought me the beetle from a glass case in which it was enclosed. It was a beautiful scarabaeus and at that time unknown to naturalists of course. A great prize in a scientific point of view. There were two round black spots near one extremity of the back and a long one near the other. The scales were exceedingly hard and glossy with all the appearance of burnished gold. The weight of the insect was very remarkable and taking all things into consideration I could hardly blame Jupiter for his opinion respecting it.
The example nicely illustrates the weakness of this class of ciphers, as even I could solve this one in a few minutes :-) Much more fun than crosswords, why don't they publish these in the papers instead? (Oh, and I was expecting the message to switch to "PWNED BY XXX <censored extreme vulgarity> HAHAHAHAHAHA" in the middle, but sadly, it didn't) 188.8.131.52 20:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Weird that this title is on cryptography. I would have expected this sort of stuff at frequency of letters but it is odd that this page also discusses this. I was expecting discussion of the frequency spectrum here. BigNate37(T) 15:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- This comment was made back when the page was at frequency analysis; that's now a disambig and this is frequency analysis (cryptanalysis). BigNate37(T) 04:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Frequency analysis (cryptanalysis) → Frequency analysis — Latter redirects to former. There is also a Frequency analysis (disambiguation) but other articles on dab page do not take the form "Frequency analysis (xxxxx)". —Aspie rational (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with
~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- If this is not accepted, then I suggest Frequency analysis (disambiguation) → Frequency analysis. Aspie rational (talk) 09:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I take the point of the nomination, it's valid, but it's not the whole story... there's a thing in audio called a frequency analyser, for example, several different devices by this name in fact, and in common English (at least) what they do is frequency analysis I guess. So there's probably lots of room for other articles called frequency analysis, and I would doubt that the meaning in cryptanalysis is the primary meaning. Andrewa (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)