Talk:Friar Tuck

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Folklore

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

What is a "Curtal Friar"? Bastie 14:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's the title of the ballad which features Friar Tuck, although not by name. I've seen a few different meaning of the word. Here's what Stephen Knight and Thomas H. Ohlgren wrote in their notes to the ballad in Robin Hood and Other Outlaw Tales.

" The term curtal has raised discussion. Most feel it refers to a shorter gown, worn for mobility: friars were associated with travel among the ordinary people, which was both a source of corruption and also, as in the Robin Hood tradition, popular acceptability. A "tucked friar" is another way of expressing this, which has become the basis for the friar's usual name, Tuck. Child, however, feels that curtal goes back to curtilarius or "gardener" and that this had been the friar's role (III, 122)."

The story given on this page doesn't make a lot of sense. If he was a friar, what was he doing in a monastery? 84.70.231.152 18:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the encyclopedia's place to make the information it reports sensible. Goldfritha 00:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are some important errors on this page...the lack of friars in Richards time is not so relevant as the earliest to ballad to name the King (the Gest) names him as "Edward". Edward the first came to the throne in 1272. The earliest known ballad survives in a version dated to approx 1450, the very tag end of the Middle Ages, Reformation on the horizon. So while I don't know when friars came to england I'll bet it was earlier than this. It is in fact unclear when the ballads are set, scholars argue about it, the main viewpoints are the 1300s or the 1200s, but it may be impossible to give them a consistent period. Friar Tuck, while not in the earliest ballads is known to have been already part of the legend at the time of the earliest extant ballads, see Robin Hood article. Robin Hood and the Curtal Friar, while it does not survive in a particularly early copy, is still one of the earlier-seeming RH ballads in the Percy Folio and probably belongs to the older group of RH ballads....it shouldn't be dismissed as a "late" ballad is what I'm saying. Jeremy (talk) 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Actually I read the page too quickly, it does mention the early mentions in the plays....but still I think leaves the impression that these were later than the extant ballads. In fact the 1475 play comes from around the same time as the earliest known ballad. And the historical outlaw called "Friar Tuck" presumably took his name from the legend, if so he was part of the legend in 1416. It may be that the early ballads that happened to survive just happened to leave him out. Jeremy (talk) 01:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the "Baldness" section: Insofar as this is either encyclopedic or relevant, is it as likely that Friar Tuck is tonsured, as would be customary for a monastic vocation than it is that he was naturally bald? ThalUtat (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikipedia editing, and I notice that this is a "fictional character." I recently discovered a page describing the Friar Tuck character in Robin Hood at http://www.lib.rochester.edu/camelot/rh/ftchar.htm, which links Friar Tuck to a historical Robert Stafford in 1429. None of the current section headers of the article seemed to fit the real-life information about the fictional character. DZAuthor (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Friar Tuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070803034123/http://www.propecia.co.nz/mphl.asp to http://www.propecia.co.nz/mphl.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]