Talk:Fundamental attribution error

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Actor–observer asymmetry into Fundamental attribution error[edit]

None given; based on this comment Firestar464 (talk) 07:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given that no case has been made, and there has been no support for this over the course of a decade. Klbrain (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms Section[edit]

I noticed a meta-analysis characterized as effectively debunking the fundamental attribution error was actually a test of a distinct, but related cognitive bias. I have updated the Criticisms section accordingly and removed the implications more of interest to this other bias, the actor-observer asymmetry. Jimmysoc (talk) 23:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this section properly summarizes the relevant section of that meta-analysis. Firstly, the author doesn't support an interpretation of the FAE, they just say that their meta-analysis doesn't contradict the "softer" version of the FAE. Secondly, I believe their meaning is that the FAE could have less to do with explaining why an actor did a particular behavior and more about tendencies to make inferences about their likelihood of doing something like that in the future. See this quote: "Yet the social perceiver's concern here is not with explaining the behavior but with inferring whether this behavior is characteristic of the person, whether he or she would show the behavior again, whether he or she has, in a word, the stable disposition to do this sort of thing." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander the good (talk • contribs) 17:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020
This page is archived by ClueBot III.