This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hentai, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hentai on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I'm glad to see the previous issue resolved without me having to type any more words. Now that the image has been appropriately buried does anyone have a suggestion for a new header? As said I'm not familiar with the genre so I don't have any particularly good ideas.Crimsonhexagon (talk) 02:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Whether you typed more words or not the matter would always have been resolved on consensus. The image is a useful illustration of a section, simply not of the entire article. It has not been buried. Your words lead me to consider re-opening the discussion simply because of the provocative word 'buried'.
There are a great many images of stated futanari with live models on a number of highly pornographic sites. If they were not subject to copyright might they illustrate the article lead rather better? They are, presumably, heavily edited pictures and they show people equipped with penis and vagina in flagrante delicious.
Wikipedia bends to consensus, not censorship. It works on editorial decisions, not on covering up images that some might find distasteful lest they frighten the horses. The prior picture was an obvious candidate not to be in the lead because the topic is wider that cartoons. This was an editorial decision.
Perhaps you should make this your genre and come up with suitable suggestions yourself. FiddleFaddle 09:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Please just drop the WP:STICK already. A consensus has been thought out, I do not know why the article would need a new image header at this point. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
I want to make this a better encyclopedia, and I agree that header images are a good idea. This article no longer has one and there hadn't been any discussion about replacing it so I started a new topic. I didn't want to just argue a single point about this page and then abandon it completely as soon as the debate is closed, but perhaps that's what I should do. My energies could be better invested. I'm not wielding a stick, I'm just trying to improve this article. It's so contentious a page I'm not going to edit it without talkpage dialogue first. Crimsonhexagon (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Im not sure what adding an image header will do though, the lead is short and adding a third image will make the article look like a photo gallery given it's size. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)