Talk:Gaelic handball

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

top handballers[edit]

The top handballers play on a Pro tour in the US. At the moment the top players include the likes of Ireland's Paul Brady, Tony Healy and America's Dave Chapman and Naty Alavarado Jnr.

The game requires unrivalled skill and dexterity and it's "perpetual motion" type action is used to train US astronauts.

Name[edit]

I have never, ever heard it called "Gaelic Handball". Always 'Handball' in English, or 'Liathróid Láimhe' in the Irish. Perhaps 'Handball (GAA)' would be a better title? 193.1.172.163 12:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe "Gaelic Handball" is required in order to avoid confusion with other handball sports.--Casaforra 09:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link[edit]

A supossed webpage about Irish Handball, [1], leads nowhere.

Some more modalities[edit]

http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joc_de_pilota

Origins[edit]

Basque pilota is commonly known as deriving from the French Jeu de paume. Same for the "Gaelic Handball"? --Casaforra 09:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

long list of people[edit]

A large list was added. I removed it, as such lists are not usually appropriate for sport articles...possibly if there is a specific championship, they might belong there with sourcing. I can't see it here.- Sinneed 13:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger into Wall handball?[edit]

It seems to me that this article and the articles on American handball and Australian handball are all really about the same sport and that the games played in the US and Australia all originated from the Irish game when they were brought there by Irish immigrants. I think the three articles should be merged into a single article called "Wall handball". There's a precedent for using the name "wall handball" since it appears on the official site of the World Handball Council. I'm not knowledgeable enough to say for sure or not if the rules and history of the sport in the three countries are different enough to justify there being three articles for them, though. I'd like to know what everyone else thinks. Sky Blu 2 (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info needed[edit]

The article says games are played to a set number of points. Is there a set standard? If so, how many points is it? Are the courts covered as is usual in the U.S.? Also, there is no mention of the ball. I assume it is the same as -- or nearly so -- that used in the American game. Is that so? Kdammers (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further point of information requested: "All you have to do is hit the ball with or without fulls (depends on location)." My question is... What the heck are "fulls"? OffColfax (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gaelic handball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaelic handball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gaelic handball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge request[edit]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: Consensus is that the current titling/structure best reflects the subjects (no consensus for merge/move)

OK, after giving it some thought, I strongly feel the three articles [this article and the articles on American handball and Australian handball] should be merged. The handball federations in the three countries interact with each other on a fairly regular basis. There are some variations between the versions played in the three countries, but there is a great deal that is the same, too. Also, the Encyclopædia Britannica has only one article for "handball". I have created a page called Handball (wall game) that everyone can take a look at which attempts to combine the three articles. If there are no objections in the next few weeks, I shall redirect the links to American handball, Gaelic handball and Australian handball to point there. Sky Blu 2 (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have concerns. There is absolutely no justification that I can see in attempting to cover the American and Irish versions of the game in the same article. By your own admission (and unless something has changed in the decade since you made the statement originally, you cannot "say for sure or not if the rules and history of the sport in the three countries" overlap sufficiently. And yet you are advocating a merge. Without any input or consensus that I have noted. Perhaps it is worthwhile having an article covering the World Handball Council. Which also discuss the overlaps (if any) between the sports and their respective governing bodies. But dealing with all three (or four?) in one article seems inappropriate to me. And then some. (PS. If you are gonna open a discussion on a possible merge, please use the related merge tags. To tag the articles that you are proposing to merge. Instead of just unilaterally creating copy/paste CFORKs.) Guliolopez (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there is the precedent that the Encyclopedia Britannica only has one entry for "handball" (you can go check if you want). Also, the names "American handball" and "Gaelic handball" seem to have been created by Wikipedia users. In most normal references, the sport is simply called "handball". Sky Blu 2 (talk) 12:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. RE: "In most most normal references, the sport is simply called handball". The same is true for the different types of football. People in Kansas don't call it American football. Just football. And people in Killarney don't call it Gaelic football. Just football. And people in Kent don't call it association football. Just football. This doesn't mean that they are all the same thing or should all be dealt with under the same article. As with handball, the different types of football may have had some common ancestry. But they are all different now. (With different rules, governing bodies, etc). And so trying to deal with them all under the one banner is unworkable. The project's naming, DAB and titling scheme all account for this. There is no reason to supercede that. The CFORKing and licencing issues with the content at Handball (wall game) have since been addressed by another editor. So, unless you want to discuss a specific proposal further, I personally expect that this topic is largely closed. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, let's see what people think. By the way, the sample for a possible merger between the three articles has been moved to my sandbox page: User:Sky Blu 2/sandbox- Sky Blu 2 (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We have now left it another 4 weeks or so. And, in the last month (as in the last decade) there have been no thoughts or responses in support of a merge. (And, rather, the limited responses that there have been over this extended period, whether from me on the Gaelic handball talk page, from an anon on the American handball talkpage or another anon on the Australian handball talkpage, have advocated against a merge. Likely because, as with the various sports called "football", that may have common ancestry, each type of handball is governed by a different organisation, has different rules, and therefore different/distinct subjects. With each covered as such in its own article.) I have removed the multiple merge tags. It might also be worthwhile closing this thread. Guliolopez (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should keep the merge tags for a while longer. I was planning on keeping them up for six months to a year to see what the response was. -Sky Blu 2 (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A year!? I can't tell if you are trolling. Or joking. Or serious. Of the last two, I'm not sure which is funnier.
While I appreciate that there is no time-limit on merge or move discussions, and that you only seem to drop-in on the project every 5 or 6 years (and then mostly to revisit this thread that you opened a decade ago), a year is excessive. Not least when, in the last decade, the only material input you have received on your proposal has been to suggest that it is not supported by any convention, editors, or policies. Or real life.
I will drop a note in some of the relevant project pages. To drive additional awareness of the proposal. If that doesn't prove fruitful, then I will be removing the tags. Again. Because leaving disruptively impactful tags in place (where they are not adding any value) is not useful.
Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - FWIW, and in case it wasn't clear already, I oppose the proposal to merge each of American handball, Australian handball and Gaelic handball, and to deal with them collectively under the title "Wall handball". While these sports (may) have a distant common ancestor, they each have (now) their own rules, governing bodies, competitions and are therefore distinct subjects. And best dealt with under their own titles. (Not to labour the point, but trying to deal with them all together is akin to trying to merge American football, Australian football and Gaelic football all under the same title.) Guliolopez (talk) 00:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - per Guliolopez plus articles already seem a decent size and merge would constrain independent expansion. Leave alone. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Just about all references to the sport make no distinctions between the versions played in Ireland and the US. There is healthy interaction in the sport between the various countries. One-wall handball and 40x20 four-wall handball are played in identical versions in both Ireland and the United States. Players from Ireland regularly play in tournaments in the US. Also, most major encyclopedias like the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the World Book Encyclopedia have only a single entry for "handball". To me, having separate articles for them is like having separate articles for hard-court tennis, grass-court tennis and clay-court tennis, when they are all essentially the same sport.- Sky Blu 2 (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I appreciate that people think about these things, but sorry, these are distinct sports, and merging makes not much more sense than merging Aussie Rules and Gaelic Football. Academically they are, yes, part of a meta-set of Wall Handball, but that is not a thing in actual sport, as the saying goes. And yes, they are all descendents of Gaelic Handball, but that line of logic could lead to an article under that title, with sub-sections, and I can't see people buying that in the USA or Australia. I think it is good that there are distinct articles, each within their country / cultural context. I would fully support generating an article on crossover between these sports, and developing on the topic of the cooperative World Handball Council, but cannot see a Merge as justified.SeoR (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. These are three good length articles with virtually no overlap between them. None of the three articles says that its subject is the same game as the other two. Therefore there is no encyclopaedic or even instinctive reason to merge them. The American handball article, in its History section, gives a good account of the separate development of the three games. The Gaelic handball article does a less good job of explaining the difference between the traditional Gaelic game and the variations developed to allow for international competition (see the GAA Handball site). Room for improvement, therefore, but no grounds for a merge. Scolaire (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Different sports - even those with a common ancestor - require different articles. In addition, "wall handball" appears to be something of a neologism. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Sky Blu 2 as far as I can tell your !vote (as nominator) is the only support for the merge. Can you please indicate you are willing to accept what appears to be consensus to clear the merge proposal or would you like me to raise a request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure or are you expecting us to wait another three weeks? Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Djm-leighpark the minimum time for a discussion is 7 days. This one has been going for 7 weeks. Anybody can close a discussion if the consensus is clear, including participants. I say go for it. Scolaire (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I second that.SeoR (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Please note because I have asked the question of Sky Blu 2 it would be unseemly for me not to give at least 24 and possibly a little over 48 hours before perfoming the close myself should there be no response and the merge proposal remained unresolved in situ. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Sounds very fair, and there is no rush, but I do hope this topic remains closed for a time thereafter. For all the thousands of Gaelic footballers (some significant share of inter-county players), hurlers and soccer players with articles, articles on other sports in Ireland are sparse, and I am sure there is lots to do to expand coverage of Handball, for example. I am sure the nomination was with only the best of intentions, and this debate has hopefully clarified matters for all.SeoR (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Djm-leighpark Sky Blu 2 has not been active on Wikipedia since 16 April – that's ten days! He can go a month or more without contributing, and indeed, he went 5+1⁄2 years from February 2013 to August last year. By all means give him another few hours, but be aware that the chances of him seeing this conversation are remote. Scolaire (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Scolaire: I have given a timetable and will stick to it. There is a certain commitment to keep at eye on in-progress nominations and if someone does not do that so be it. One can also sign up for the old email alerts. My intention to to proceed as I have said. Of course what you do is your business. I shall remember PG a grand (hay)cock player who would tell me of the great local handball players over the tea. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • I'm afraid that went right over my head. Anyway, I wasn't arguing with you, just making some observations. It's all good. Scolaire (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
            • Fair play. And was I not having the craic? And ye can have more craic at ANI.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
              • @Scolaire according to rules of engagement you could have performed the close yourself rather than I who had additional self imposed restrictions. If I had told you you could do that I would have been open to accusations of incitement. Now I wish I'd had a bet on the chances are remote.... Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, while I still feel the articles should be merged, I can fully accept the consensus reached by the Wikipedia community. Close the discussion if you wish. Though I'd just like to point out one last time, for everyone's consideration, that the Encyclopaedia Britannica has only a single article for "handball", if you take a look. -Sky Blu 2 (talk) 03:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thankyou for coming back to us, it is appreciated. I will probably execute the close later tonight or tomorrow. (Unless anyone else wishes to execute the procedure themselves). The thoughts of a door to door Encyclopaedia Britannica salesman in Ireland has me in stitches, but perhaps SeoR has one?. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Resolved Closing as "no consensus for merge". Guliolopez (talk) 10:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gaelic_handball&oldid=1207339192"