|WikiProject Companies||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Software / Computing||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Computer Security / Computing||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
Removed the edit "In May 2013, a malicious installer distributed by Genieo partner Softonic was found by security software company Intego." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 07:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
The malware claim is incorrect. by wiki definition a malware is short for malicious software, that used or programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information, or gain access to private computer systems. Genieo is none of the above and was never used to do any of the above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 15:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Added the Virus Total link to support virus clean claim.
Added a new Virus Total link showing 5 flags as a trojan/malware, in addition to Intego The IP : 18.104.22.168 appears to be Genieo itself, altering unfavourable information, even though it is from reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Genieo is not a spyware/malware or any sort of thing, check yourself if Genieo is transferring data from your personal computer and you will see you're totally wrong. so instead of saying lies and making up, why won't you let anti-virus companies do their jobs and stop with your dirty work and trying to promote your shitty thesafemac.com website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
IP : 188.8.131.52 is Genieo, they should not tamper with verifiable critical content about their own product.
Several respected sources and anti-virus applications recognise Genieo as adware or even malware. That is all the 'clue' required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 12:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Removed the edit about "being scrutinized as malware, because it being increasingly reported hijacking computers", such a claim must be backed by reliable sources WP:BURDEN. Irishcajun85: please repost with such sources if you have them, like MYSELF. -- I'm finding a lot of people who don't know how this program got onto their computer and started gathering contact information etc. No wonder you have a bad rep. Well deserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
You find a lot of people who don't know how this program got onto their computers? you find a lot of idiots that don't know what a browser is as well, that claim got no point. Instead of accusing, give a proof.
Removed the section about malware which is irrelevent to this topic
Malware :from wikipedia
'Malware' is a general term used to refer to a variety of forms of hostile or intrusive software.
Removed all spam claiming Genieo is a malware
This is an on going processes of removing incorrect and defamatory information about Genieo.
Reverted recent changes by 18.104.22.168 who are the subject of this page & who keep removing verified but unfavourable content. Facts are not spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Genieo themselves : 126.96.36.199 keep vandalising the article & removing legitimate, verified & referenced content which they perceive as critical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 11:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Some of the sources cited claiming that this is malware were clearly not reliable, like links to Mac support forums. However, there may be more reliable sources. I lack the expertise to make these calls on my own, so I am going to open a thread on WP:RSN. --Jprg1966 (talk) 16:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Could you explain why links to the opinions of experienced, albeit volunteer supporter on Apple support site are 'clearly not reliable' while your own volunteer efforts seemingly are enough to know that ?. Genieo is recognised as malware/adware by several virus removal tools & by mac 'security' websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
How can you claim Genieo is a spyware when MOST and nearly ALL anti-virus programs don't recognize it as such? Users install Genieo on their own accord, no one is forcing them to download and use it, it's not a problem to remove it, just because it might leave some files on the system doesn't mean it's a malware/spyware, you can check and see it doesn't send any information to their company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
According to TheSafeMac, the Genieo app is installed under the guise of a fake Flash Player installer. There is the Genieo Partner Network, where they pay people to promote Genieo. Perhaps the partners are doing this so they can make revenue? Either way, this is unwanted software as the user would expect Flash Player, not Genieo. Dr. Web and Intego (antiviruses) have even added Genieo detection to their products. IsraphelMac (talk) 02:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Several respected antivirus/security companies classify Genieo & Installmac as at best, potentially unwanted & adware/malware. That fact is rightly mentioned in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
You can keep repeating that Genieo is a malware according to two antivirus, when the other 40 don't define it as such, so I see no point in mentioning it, as it got nothing wrong with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmatic666 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
It's not two - Dr. Web, Avast, F-Secure, Trend Micro Housecall and GData and Intego have all characterised it as adware or a 'PuP' (potentially unwanted program), and there are numerous sites describing how to remove the 'Genieo virus" or "Genieo adware". The fact that You, Enigmatic666, see nothing wrong, does not make it true... nor does it invalidate verified sources & justify removal. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
It's obvious from the revision history that the subject of the page, or their agents/supporters are determined to excise all perceived criticism & connection with adware/malware etc... also that more than one other party is keen to see that those 'facts' are left in place.
In the interests of resolving the dispute - can we discuss why say Intego.com or thesafemac.com might not be considered reliable sources & thus their opinions worth mentioning ?.
Also, it might be considered here, that a web-search for 'Genieo' produces 100's of results asking for help in removing the Genieo 'adware', 'virus' 'malware' etc. Regardless of the company intentions, it seems clear that many users, & 'experts' too, see their products in a poor light, and that should not be hidden from anyone seeking information at wikipedia... doubly so when the are verifiable & reliable sources for those points of view.
The topic needs protections from people like you that try to change the topic into something else, and advertising your own website (thesafemac). How can one put a source of information to his own website? it is ridiculous. Genieo is not causing any harm, it can be removed with ease, it's not gathering any information to their servers, and it's legit and free to use, so what's your problem with reverting this page over and over? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmatic666 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Genieo make their own unsupported claims - at best backed by a link to 'their' own website. What's your source that thesafemac are responsible for any edits here ?. How do you explain the position of Intego & other AV companies ?126.96.36.199 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
There's only Intego and Dr.Web you're refering to, most and other AV companies don't define Genieo as adware/malware/virus, it seems it's Thomas A Reed or someone else related to him that change the wiki values, since they put a link to thesafemac to get some kind of stupid credit for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmatic666 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Dr. Web, Avast, F-Secure, Trend Micro Housecall and GData. as well as Intego. Why are your own opinions superior to theirs ?. 'Most' isn't all, so it's fair that verified mention of the considerable criticism is left in place. 188.8.131.52 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
As well as Intego, and the 5 other flags for the Mac version shown at
there are 7 for a Windows version
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
It's clear from the links that user add to the Genieo page that he's associate with thesafemac.com and/or Thomas A Reed, and that he got some agenda of compromising Genieo's good name. Please, any Wikipedia Editors, remove those links, they aren't a reliable source of information, and does not contribute to the user that want to watch Genieo value.
Furthermore, he's stating Genieo is a malware/adware while only 5 out of 48 Anti-virus companies defined Genieo as such, so it's very misleading for the user to see Genieo as something bad. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
another possible source - I've no way of knowing if it's reliable. Surely, not all the above-mentioned Windows & Mac companies can be associated with safemac/Thomas Reed ? & yet there are 6 who flag it for Mac and another 6 (+ Intego?) for Windows. That's obviously far from a majority, but seems much more than something to be dismissed or ignored because Genieo say it's ok. Is wikipedia meant for "user that want to watch Genieo value." ?. The company can pay to advertise/promote elsewhere, no ?. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Malware ? : a new section
I started a new section, since others have become confusing & accusatory in part.
The mac version is now shown as at least undesirable by 16 companies at https://www.virustotal.com/en-gb/file/f41fe0a11478663182c18c747f856f029f710046f723a8c810662e3ac1f11c0d/analysis/1393415274/
and by ProtectMac : http://www.protectmac.com/news/index_files/77a450d61e46497cf6d456c2ae50c708-77.html 18.104.22.168 (talk) 21:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)