Talk:George Westinghouse

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Trains High‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

The opening paragraph (comparison with Edison) is very POV and adds nothing meaningful to the article.

Edison V. Westinghouse[edit]

I belive that this article is very well written. It's opening comment is supported by the text extreamly well --69.81.167.49 23:28, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hmm... at the very least, it is an odd opening paragraph, not a good way to start the article off. As far as POV goes, it may just slightly be leaning in that direction, but without nessesarily crossing over the line. func (talk) 03:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I've had a shot at improving the intro, at least. J.K. 08:06, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

last paragraph[edit]

well written article, excepting this: from the last paragraph, "He was mourned."

As this stands, well, my reaction is "odd that it's pointed out. he vast majority of people are." If this an attmept to convey that there was a public mourning, it doesn't. ("He was publically mourned." would be a start there, if that's the intention.)

I think i'm going to delete the sentence in a few days unless it's clarified. I mean no disrespect to him, but just generally being mourned isn't particularly noteworthy.

last paragraph[edit]

The opening paragraph (comparison with Edison) is very POV and adds nothing meaningful to the article. It souldn't talk about Edison's fight with him. It doesn't fit.

Renamed Company ???[edit]

A quote from the article:

That same year, he formed the "Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company", which was renamed the "Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company" in 1889.

The before and after company names are the same. There must be a mistake somewhere. The linked article, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, says this new name came in 1945, so it is not clear what the company's old name was. H Padleckas 08:03, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Tesla[edit]

I'm not sure it is quite right to describe Westinghouse as Tesla's 'friend'. As far as I can tell it was very one sided - Westinghouse got a lot out of Tesla and Tesla didn't get much in return. Also Westinghouse did not support Tesla after his initial work on a.c. - e.g. Tesla had to go to JP Morgan for support on his wireless transmission project. I think 'business partner' would be nearer the truth than 'friend' 4kinnel 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

section Electricity and the "War of Currents" should be shortened[edit]

I think the section Electricity and the "War of Currents" should be shortened, because Main article War of Currents exists. The section should be the abstruct of the article War of Currents. But I cannot think the section is the abstruct. So sentences should be moved (and merged ) from the section Electricity and the "War of Currents" to the article War of Currents, if they do not exist in the article. Thank you. Penpen0216 09:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benz Velo Picture[edit]

Any reason the picture of Benz's Velo is here? I don't see any reference to it in the text. JaKaL! (talk) 13:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you see some thing like this, be bold and take it out! That particular error has been here since May 08 - I guess no-one reads the article, or people just like pictures of old cars. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that Tesla "conceived" rotaing magnetic field in 1882[edit]

No evidence that Tesla created anything concerning AC motor and rotating magnetic field before 1888. Galileo Ferraris discovered the principle in 1885 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnagr (talk • contribs) 19:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified Tesla[edit]

I have rewritten the sections referring to Tesla because it seemed to be unreferenced Tesla fan fiction/myth such as this was a "Tesla system", that this had anything to do with Tesla's time at Edison, or that induction motors were immediately adopted. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 22:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heritage[edit]

Westinghouse's first American ancestor was an ethnic German immigrant from Westphalia named Wistinghausen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:490E:23A:456C:80E9:AB62:DFC2 (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be a "Death and Legacy" section?[edit]

Seems odd not to have it StainlessSteelScorpion (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on George Westinghouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141021035057/http://www.georgewestinghouse.com/timeline.html to http://www.georgewestinghouse.com/timeline.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Westinghouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017090503/http://pabook.libraries.psu.edu/palitmap/bios/Westinghouse__George.html to http://pabook.libraries.psu.edu/palitmap/bios/Westinghouse__George.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]