|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
American editors whose only experience of Georgian architecture is in Colonial American architecture and neo-Georgian need to be careful not to ascribe localisms, such as columns of painted wood or ship-lap clabboards (inherited from East Anglian vernacular architecture), to describe the style as a whole. --Wetman 20:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Point well taken, but you should not assume that I am Ameircan simply because I write about it. etc. I checked on some books and found no reference to East Anglian vernacular. At any rate, if you can verify the fact that US Georgian wood buildings have as their source East Anglian buildings then you should put it in. It would be a good addition.Brosi 00:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- My point was a general one, not a personal one. American colonial Georgian architecture is a provincial reflection: it does not define the style. That the clapboard siding of East Anglia is the prototype for New England clapboarding is a commonplace. Isn't it remarked upon in passing in any survey of American colonial architecture? --Wetman 07:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Georgian Style/Georgian architecture
Yes College of William and Mary is not the best example. Feel free to change it. Faneille Hall in Boston is better, not a classic case either. The main problem I have is ambiguous difference between the Georgian Style and those buildings built during the reigns of all the king George, i.e. Georgian architecture. The term could refer to both. There were a lot of byuildings during the reigns of the king that does not conform to what is now known as the Georgian Style. Should this be discussed? I.e. how would you rank St. Mary Woolnoth, by Nicholas Hawksmoor). It is often listed as an example of Georgian architecture but is it Georgian in the stylistic sense? Perhaps you know.Brosi 21:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- The college of William and Mary (completed 1702) was an unlucky hit: famously one of the very few Baroque structures in the colonies. "Georgian style" simply applies to classicizing buildings built during the reigns of the Georges: "flourishing mainly under George III" is an artifact of insufficient experience with Georgian buildings outside USA: could the reader suppose that fewer structures were built?. Not every chicken coop built was "Georgian": that's what is expressed by the expression "vernacular" building". A good on-line article that sets "Georgian" (which is an American "synonym" for "Classicizing") colonial architecture in historical context is James Deetz, "In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life" skim down to p. 110. Deetz gives a sense of building practice. --Wetman 07:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK You can please remove William and Mary - I found the example in one of my books taht listed it as Georgian - maybe not a good book. But what would a more proper example be in the US. There are dozens of houses, but I was thinking of something a bit more noteworthy. How about the the Governor's Palace in Williamsburg, Virginia (1706-1714)?Brosi 15:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Another unlucky shot: the Governor's Palace, Williamsburg, Virginia, was recreated in 1930-34, based on a survey of the foundations, remarks in letters and a contemporary engraving. The interiors are Neo-Georgian, the architecture is in the manner of Sir Christopher Wren. Perhaps British and Irish examples would make more dependable illustrations. --Wetman (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
The Georgian architectural style is British, yet a disproportionate amount of this article seems to dwell on American interpretations and imitations. Surely all of these should be grouped under the heading of 'Colonial Georgian' (which could perhaps merit an article of its own) and more of an emphasis placed upon the British expression of the style. It does, after all, account for an extremely large amount of the building stock around the United Kingdom.
On another note, 'A portico in the middle of the roof with a ring window in the middle' is not what I would have called a common feature by any means. I can't even think of an example where I've seen one, and I've lived in Georgian houses all my life.
- That would have been "an oculus in the pediment" under better circumstances. The present bulletted list of "General characteristics" is based on a familiarity with Colonial American Georgian houses and Colonial Revival ones. A better section would follow Summerson et al, with quotes for descriptions, in order to avoid cries of "original research", as above. --Wetman 19:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC) --Wetman 19:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's true that this article should center on actual British examples, with American Georgian architecture taking a sideline. As far as I can tell at the moment (2011), it's in pretty good shape as far as that balance is concerned. It would be nice if there were a separate article devoted to American colonial architecture in the Georgian style. As for the examples of American Georgian that we do mention in the text, it seems a bit arbitrary to single out Brown and Samford Universities and the College of William and Mary. Brown has one prominent Georgian building (University Hall) and at least one transitional Federal-period house (the Nightingale-Brown House) with significant Georgian stylistic traits. William and Mary does have a couple of authentic Georgian buildings (the Brafferton Building and President's House, both by the Henry Carys, Sr. and Jr.) Samford has no authentic Georgian buildings at all, though it does have a lot of decent mid-20th-century Georgian Revival buildings, like many colleges in the US. One could argue that Harvard University is more worthy of mention--it has four authentic Georgian buildings (Massachusetts Hall, Wadsworth House, Holden Chapel, and Harvard Hall). But why limit ourselves to university campuses? Boston is noteworthy not only for Faneuil Hall but for the Old State House, Old North Church, Old South Meeting House, and King's Chapel. There are noteworthy collections of Georgian houses in Portsmouth, Ipswich, Marblehead, Cambridge, Hingham, Bristol, and Providence, to name only a sampling from coastal New England. Plenty, too, down south, though I don't know that area as well. Alexandria, VA? New Bern, NC? Charleston, SC? 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well, the article has since changed slightly--now it mentions Miami University and the University of Maryland, neither of which is notable for actual Georgian architecture. (Miami University apparently has a couple of Federal dorms from the 1820s; Maryland is a much later campus with Georgian Revival buildings but no authentic Georgian examples.) There's also a couple of images of 20th and 21st-century American academic Georgian Revival, but no images of original Georgian university buildings. So I'm replacing the image from the College of New Jersey with an image of Harvard's Massachusetts Hall. Frankly, I'd like to get rid of the Francis Xavier image too, unless someone strongly feels the article needs to include a Georgian Revival building among its images.
- More broadly, with respect to the collection of images, it does seem disproportionate for four of the seven to be American examples. I'd think a better distribution would be to have four from Britain and Ireland (a couple of public buildings, one fairly grand country house, and one more modest town house?), and only three at most from the United States and Canada (perhaps one academic building or church, one brick plantation building from the South, and one clapboard house from New England). And I'd favor having them all be photos of surviving buildings, rather than including one lonely reproduction of an 18th-century print. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- I was going to add a link to the preceding Queen Anne Style architecture till I looked at it. Words fail me. Johnbod (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
How was it distinctive from, say, French architecture?
From this article it seems that Georgian architecture is so-called because the buildings were built during the reign of kings named George. However, what characteristics of this architecture made it distinctive from architecture elsewhere in affluent parts of continental Europe, or indeed from the styles extant in Britain before the reign of the Hanovers? How much of it was what one might term a "national" architecture? 188.8.131.52 (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)