Talk:Geosynthetics

Geosynthetics was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 14, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewritten[edit]

I have rewritten and extended the article. Although it is by no means finished it has a backbone of a good article hopefully. Further edits, extensions and comments will be welcommed. Grahams Child 20:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination has failed[edit]

The Good article nomination for Geosynthetics has failed, for the following reason(s):

I don't think this yet qualifies as well written - each paragraph seems more like a short definition than encyclopaedic prose. The bullet pointed list under disadvantages should be converted to prose. And section headings need to follow the capitalisation described in the WP:MOS. Finally, a standard width should be used for images for aesthetic reasons. Alternating left and right alignment also usually looks better. Worldtraveller 11:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikified External Links[edit]

Wiki edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuartfost (talk • contribs) 13:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]