Talk:Gezhouba Dam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gezhouba Dam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dams Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

One of the largest locks in the World?[edit]

The article currently reads:

"The navigation lock No. 2 on the third channel was, when built, one of the largest in the world."

At 280 meters it is slightly longer than a Seawaymax lock. But its depth, at five metres, is just 60% that of the St Lawrence Seaway. The largest vessel to traverse the Seaway was 28,000 tons. There are over a dozen locks on the Seaway. The Panama Canal, Manchester Ship Canal and the Kiel Canal also have larger capacity locks. -- Geo Swan 06:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The North Sea Canal has a lock 400 x 50 x 15 meters. Another instance of a lock larger than the Chinese lock. The assertion that it is one of the largest in the world should be removed or amended. -- Geo Swan 18:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gezhou dam[edit]

shouldn't it be "gezhou dam" as 'ba' means dam in chinese  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.26.63 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, yes. I did some translation for Chinese cartographers in Beijing, and official policy is to transliterate the final syllable of a place name that identifies the nature of a landmark only if the full name is only two syllables long (e. g. Taishan is "Taishan Mountain" in English, not just "Tai Mountain"), but to translate it otherwise (e. g. "Cangyanshan" is "Mount Cangyan"). 131.171.50.15 (talk) 17:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1580m³?[edit]

"The reservoir has a total volume of 1,580 m3 (55,797 cu ft)." is obviously wrong, because that's the volume of a large swimming pool, not the volume of a 3,11GW hydroplan... --Pcmadman (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It should be 1.58 km3. It is fixed now. Beagel (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gezhouba Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Bm527ouX?url=http://www.china-yangtzecruise.com/yangtzethreegorges/jd12.htm to http://www.china-yangtzecruise.com/yangtzethreegorges/jd12.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]