Talk:Glamorgan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glamorgan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability
Archives: 1

Glamorgan was one of the Geography and places good article nominees, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

October 2, 2011

Good article nominee

Not listed

WikiProject Wales

(Rated C-class, Top-importance)

Wales portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

C

This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: "Glamorgan" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images

[edit] Quick review

This is a very decent article with a lot of information which appears at first glance to be well sourced. It is certainly B class. Areas for attention - expand the lead to reflect more of the content of the article. The lead should be a mini article - a summary for those who don't wish to spend a half an hour or more reading the whole thing. See WP:Lead. There are a lot of images cluttered near the start of the article, and very few near the end. Space them out a bit more - and pay attention to captions - see WP:Captions. The Transport section is very detailed - it should be broken out in WP:Summary style to a sub-article: Transport in Glamorgan. Remember to leave a summary. Make the relationship between Glywysing and Morgannwg clearer - and sooner; it looks odd at the moment. Consult WP:UKCITIES for guidelines on how to structure the article (History before Geography, for example). Good luck. I'll pop back later to have a look. SilkTork *^YES! 00:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Glamorgan

[edit] Quick review

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export